13 Sep Betsy DeVos Loses Student Loan Lawsuit Brought by 19 States
Published by Bloomberg News
U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos lost a lawsuit brought by 19 states and the District of Columbia, accusing her department of wrongly delaying implementation of Obama-era regulations meant to protect students who took out loans to attend college from predatory practices.
A Washington federal court judge on Wednesday ruled the department’s postponement of the so-called Borrower Defense rule was procedurally improper.
The Obama administration created the rule in the wake of revelations that some for-profit colleges enticed students with promises of an education and diplomas that would allow them to get jobs in their chosen fields. In reality, many of those certifications weren’t recognized by prospective employers, leaving graduates saddled with student loans they couldn’t repay.
The Borrower Defense regulations changed the rules for forgiving student loans in cases of school misconduct and required “financially risky institutions” to be prepared to cover government losses in those instances, according to U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss’s 57-page ruling.
By postponing the effective date of those regulations, the Education Department deprived students “of several concrete benefits that they would have otherwise accrued,” Moss said. “The relief they seek in this action — immediate implementation of the Borrower Defense regulations — would restore those benefits.”
Writing that he didn’t want to delay matters further, Moss — a 2014 appointee of President Barack Obama — said he will hold a hearing Friday to consider remedies.
The department didn’t respond to a request for comment.
The regulations were to take effect on July 1, 2017, but the government delayed implementation in June of that year after the California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools sued challenging the validity of the rule.
DeVos said then that while her “first priority” was to protect students, the Obama administration’s rule-making effort had “missed an opportunity to get it right.” In October, her department provisionally reset the effective date to July 1, 2018, and then, in February postponed it again, now to July 1, 2019.
Moss ruled all those delays were invalid. He rejected a succession of arguments from government lawyers, calling some “unpersuasive,” and others “unhelpful.” His decision also covered claims by two student-borrowers in a lawsuit filed on their behalf by the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen. The states’ suit was later consolidated with it.
The Friday hearing will include California Association attorneys.
The states’ case is Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. U.S. Department of Education, 17-cv-01331, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington). The individuals’ case is Bauer v. DeVos, 17-cv-1330, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane Continues Investigating
Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane lawyers often represent individuals harmed by fraud, or other unfair or deceptive practices and are continuing to investigate Capella’s programs. Most cases of this type are taken on a contingency fee basis, meaning that Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane would advance the case costs, and only get paid for their fees and costs out of money they recover for their clients.
Capella students who believe they were victims of fraudulent conduct or misrepresentations by Capella should fill out an online Contact Form or contact attorney Paul Lesko at 314-833-4826 or at email@example.com for a FREE Consultation.